Liskow attorneys Cheryl Kornick, Bob Angelico, and Tyler Trew achieved a victory for the University of New Orleans Research and Technology Foundation (“UNORTF”) in a significant legal battle concerning property tax exemptions. The case was tried before the Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals, which found after a trial on the merits that the
Despite voters rejecting several tax-related constitutional amendments in a March referendum, the Louisiana Legislature has approved two new amendments to appear on the ballot next April. The two amendments would afford the Legislature more flexibility in developing budgets and making tax changes.
Although pet food and jurisdictional quandaries might seem equally unpalatable, the United States Supreme Court recently tackled a case that touched on both topics. Royal Canin U. S. A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. ___, 2025 WL 96212, at *6 (U.S. Jan. 15, 2025). It all started with pet food marketing.
On January 23, 2025, Philip Kirk Jones and Kelly Scalise secured a significant appellate victory for two charitable foundations, The Marshall Heritage Foundation and Marshall Legacy Foundation (“Foundations”), in a trust litigation brought by a co-trustee of the Foundations against a co-trustee of the Peroxisome Trust, the funding trust of the Foundations.
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court held that Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires a court to stay a proceeding pending arbitration and provides no discretion for the court to dismiss the action.
On Friday, April 12, 2024, LuLu Reisman, George Denegre, Carey Menasco, and Melanie Derefinko secured a significant appellate victory for Luv n’ care, Ltd. (“LNC”), an international manufacturer of baby products, against Eazy-PZ, LLC (“EZPZ”), a Colorado-based baby product manufacturer and former Shark Tank contestant, in a patent and trade dress infringement case.
Liskow lawyers Tyler Trew and Sheri Corales recently secured a ruling in their favor in Louisiana state court, at the preliminary stage of the litigation, dismissing the entirety of Plaintiffs’ claims against Liskow’s client, Lincoln Wood Products, Inc. (“Lincoln”).
As a matter of first impression, the Fifth Circuit held that an oil-and-gas royalties class action belongs in federal court based on its interpretation that the “principal injuries” prong of the CAFA local controversy exception requires all plaintiffs sustain their principal injuries in the forum state.
On March 11, 2024, Liskow lawyers Kathryn Gonski and Melanie Derefinko secured the denial of a motion to remand on improper joinder grounds and the dismissal of an intentional tort claim against Methanex, a major Louisiana plant owner, in Knight v. Turner Industries Group, L.L.C., et al., No. 23-469 (M.D. La.).
On February 15, 2024, Liskow lawyers Kathryn Gonski and Shannon Holtzman secured a unanimous, published United States Fifth Circuit Opinion in Shaw v. Restoration Hardware, Inc., affirming a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal without leave to amend. 2024 WL 640246 (5th Cir. Feb. 15, 2024). Through this opinion, the Fifth Circuit reaffirmed the pleading requirements for breach of contract and quasi-contractual claims.